Altitud
Edition · 25 May 2026
All trainings

AI TRAINING

AI for CTOs: Engineering Organisation Design

Leave with a concrete AI-augmented engineering strategy covering talent, tooling, and platform investment decisions.

See if this training is the right one for your team, free diagnostic

Run the diagnostic
Format
programme
Duration
20-32h
Level
practitioner
Group size
6-20
Price / participant
€4K-€7K
Group price
€25K-€55K
Audience
CTOs, VP Engineering, and Heads of Platform in mid-to-large technology-driven organisations
Prerequisites
Active engineering leadership role (CTO, VP Eng, or equivalent); familiarity with software development lifecycle and team management

What it covers

This practitioner-level programme equips CTOs and VP Engineering with the frameworks and decision-making tools to redesign their engineering organisations around AI capabilities. Participants evaluate developer productivity tooling, build AI platform investment theses, and define talent strategies that blend AI-native and traditional engineering roles. The format combines peer cohort sessions, case studies from scaled engineering orgs, and a capstone organisation design exercise. Participants leave with a board-ready roadmap for AI integration across their engineering function.

What you'll be able to do

  • Build a scored vendor evaluation matrix for AI developer tooling and present a justified buy/build/partner recommendation
  • Design an AI-augmented engineering org chart with defined team topologies, responsibilities, and headcount implications
  • Define a 12-month talent strategy that identifies roles to retrain, roles to hire, and roles impacted by AI automation
  • Construct a platform investment roadmap distinguishing foundational infrastructure from quick-win productivity tools
  • Produce a board-ready business case quantifying productivity gains, cost impacts, and risk factors of the proposed AI strategy

Topics covered

  • AI-assisted developer productivity: Copilot, Cursor, and beyond
  • Build vs. buy vs. partner: AI vendor stack evaluation frameworks
  • Platform engineering investments for AI workloads (MLOps, LLMOps)
  • Talent strategy: hiring, upskilling, and role redefinition in AI-augmented teams
  • Engineering org design models: platform teams, AI guilds, embedded AI squads
  • Measuring engineering effectiveness with AI tooling (DORA, SPACE metrics)
  • AI governance and security posture for engineering organisations
  • Budget modelling and board-level business cases for AI platform investment

Delivery

Delivered as a 4-week cohort programme with two 3-hour live virtual sessions per week, supplemented by async case study reading and a group capstone project. In-person intensive formats (2-day offsite) are available for executive leadership teams. Hands-on exercises account for approximately 50% of learning time. Participants receive a facilitated peer network of engineering leaders across non-competing industries. All materials, frameworks, and templates are provided digitally.

What makes it work

  • Executive sponsorship: CTO champions the AI engineering vision explicitly, rather than delegating to a single AI team
  • Pilot-then-scale discipline: one high-visibility team adopts AI tooling with defined success metrics before org-wide rollout
  • Role clarity: new AI-adjacent responsibilities (prompt engineers, AI platform engineers) are formally defined in job architecture
  • Regular feedback loops: quarterly engineering effectiveness reviews that tie AI tool adoption to DORA and SPACE metric trends

Common mistakes

  • Treating AI tooling adoption as a bottom-up engineering choice rather than a strategic org-design decision with budget and governance implications
  • Deploying AI developer tools without updating engineering metrics, leading to misleading productivity signals
  • Underestimating talent strategy change, assuming existing engineers will self-organise around new AI workflows without structured upskilling
  • Selecting AI infrastructure vendors based on technical demos alone, without evaluating data residency, compliance, and long-term TCO

When NOT to take this

This programme is not the right fit if the organisation has fewer than 10 engineers or has not yet shipped a production product, foundational engineering practices should be established before redesigning the org around AI augmentation.

Providers to consider

Sources

Use cases this training unlocks

Other trainings at this level

This training is part of a Data & AI catalog built for leaders serious about execution. Take the free diagnostic to see which trainings your team needs.